![]() ![]() Confusion, rather, occurs during emotional disturbance as in hysteria and schizophrenia, when those affected are unable to distinguish critical parts of their own experience from the other levels of imagery. The criteria spontaneously function with total clarity so the motorist is not confused and responds appropriately. ) Nevertheless, such distinctions are made without confusion in everyday life: a motorist does not respond to a danger signal as if it is merely a dream experience, or a memory of a past event, or a fantasy image. (See Analysis of Mind by Bertrand Russell, 1921, p. 145. Various types of images correspond at many junctures, making it difficult for psychologists and philosophers to define the criteria for distinguishing between images. Other treatments include that of Leask, Haber, and Haber, who describe the eidetic as “a visual image, representing a previously scanned stimulus, persisting for up to several minutes, and phenomenally located in front of the eyes” (p. 25).ĭavid Marks and Peter McKellar state, “EI can be induced by a number of different methods: 1) by the presentation of an external stimulus (e.g., a picture or a tune) 2) by a thought, suggestion, idea or internal image or 3) by some combination of 1 and 2." 2. In more recent uses of the term, vivid memory images have been described as eidetic images (Horowitz, 1970, p. 22), “an exceptionally vivid memory image that occurs immediately after the perception” (Hebb, 1972, p. 242), “the ability possessed by a minority of people to ‘see’ an image that is an exact copy of the original sensory experience” (Kagan & Havemann, 1972, p. 588), the “half-way house to hallucination” (Drever, 1964, p. 80). American psychologist Gordon Willard Allport formulated a similar definition and emphasized the “healthful” structure of the eidetic by stating “definition should be understood to exclude both pathological hallucinations and dream images, and to admit those spontaneous images of phantasy which, though possessed of perceptual character, cannot be said to be literally revivals or restorations of any specific perception.” (Allport, 1924, p. 100) In seeing an eidetic image, definite somatic events as well as a feeling of meaning are also present. ![]() The eidetic image is “seen” within the mind or literally seen externally. The eidetic image is not dependent on any prior experience, condition, state, or event. In a more general context, the eidetic can be defined as a normal subjective visual image experienced with noticeable vividness whether evoked by an actual external object or not. Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words? Memory & Cognition, 32, 742–751.In Klüver's words, "the Eidetic Image has been identified in psychological literature as a vision, as a source for new thought and feeling, as a material picture in the mind which can be scanned by the person as he would scan a real current event in his environment, and as a potent, highly significant stimulus which arises from within the mind and throws it into a series of self-revealing imagery effects" (Klüver, 1932 Richardson, 1969 Ahsen, 1977). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 33–52. Emotional arousal and memory binding: An object-based framework. Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: Evidence from taboo Stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV. Phases of influence: How emotion modulates the formation and retrieval of declarative memories. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition, 5, 73–99.įrederickson, B., & Branigan, C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |